why are rolls royce, bentley, ferrrari, lamborghini, and maybach not categories in Yahoo Answers-Cars & Transp
by Rami ™
Question by videogamer1979: why are rolls royce, bentley, ferrrari, lamborghini, and maybach not categories in Yahoo Answers-Cars & Transp
why are rolls royce, bentley, ferrrari, lamborghini, and maybach not categories in Yahoo Answers-Cars & Transportation-Car Makes?
i’ve seen all of these cars on the street being driven around except the maybach
Best answer:
Answer by §ĥăŽ
hmmm maybe because they don’t need publicity as everyone knows about em. Or they didn’t pay yahoo to put their names in the list.
What do you think? Answer below!
| Print article | This entry was posted by Hot4u on September 27, 2010 at 5:55 pm, and is filed under All Auto Makes. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about 1 year ago
Because not 2 many dudes can afford them
about 1 year ago
there is one place called other cars and transportation
about 1 year ago
I’m going to use a little bit from the previous peoples posts here. I think the main reasons are..
1. How many people can afford these cars? Do you see them very often cruising the neighborhood?
2. If you did have the money to afford one, the lowest priced one is probably in the $150-$175K. Would you really be sitting on Yahoo answers at your JOB answering questions about them. I know i’d be too busy driving mine to be on the internet.
3. For all of us dreamers there’s the “Other” section in cars and transportation. The reason for this category… see answers 1 and 2.
about 1 year ago
Ok, ignor what the last guy said.
The cheapest Ferrari is $10,000. Its a complete Piece of SHIT. Its called a 308 GT/4. For a REAL nice one, its still only 20K. I have more than that invested in my cars.
I publish a Ferrari Magazine, Therefore; I have driven Many-MANY different kinds of Ferraris’, I have also owned a Silver 1998 F355 F1 Spyder, until somone hit me in Traffic in Orange County ( Los Angeles). I have to say, I love Ferrari’s, but unless you are buying a new F430, or even a later 360. They arent worth the hassle. Its like, when they were being assembled, the people were drunk. They have MANY electrical problems, but they are good cars — when they work right. I would take my NSX over that F355 ANY day. Better gas milage, its faster (its modified), the ride quality and handling are damn near the same. I think that the NSX is a better buy – all-round.
My uncle has also owned a 1990 Ferrari F40. Great car! Fast, stiffer than a buck-board, no air, no cruise, no ABS, to Traction Control, no NOTHING! Its just a RAW car – you drive it yourself with no aid from anything. Again, it was nice…when it ran. Over 75% of the time, it wouldnt start due to some minuscule problem. It also went thru turbos like no tomarrow. He also owned a 1989 Lamborghini Countach 25th Anniversary car. That car….was a complete POS. I would never tell anyone to buy a Countach.
Dont get me wrong…I love Lamborghini, I plan on purchasing a 2006 Murciélago Roadster within the next 12 months. But the early cars are more problems that people think. You usually get what you pay for.
Any questions about ANY kind of exotic car, let me know. Who knows, it MAY come up in the FAQ section of my next issue.
Maxwell222000@yahoo.com
Thanks,
-M. J.