Indie Film The Graduates Rocks Box Office

by Cross Duck
Indie Film The Graduates Rocks Box Office
So, I saw this movie the other week because a friend told me it was online for free as some kind of a promo. I wasn’t expecting much – it looked like another standard teen sex romp movie on the outside – but I found that there was a lot more to “The Graduates” than other movies in its genre.
Let’s face it, a lot of comedies made today suck. I mean: “Scream 4″!? “Disaster Movie”? Come on! What happened to the smart, clever movies that people like Steve Martin USED to make, like “The Jerk?” Now all you have to do is say or do something outlandish or weird in order to get a movie made (cough – Will Ferrell).
Judd Apatow’s crew are on the right track. They’ve put the emphasis back on character and relationships, but the people that did “The Graduates” seem to be pushing for more – something with quality acting and grounded relationships – things that people can relate to and connect to and FEEL for.
I don’t remember the last time I saw a teen sex comedy or coming of age comedy where I really gave a hoot whether the characters/actors lived or died – and that’s just what happened for me with “The Graduates.” I liked “The Graduates.” I really did. I liked it even MORE when I found out that it was made for under 0,000.00. Now that’s impressive. Think of how much money is wasted on such terrible movies, then see this movie – wow.
I saw all these bizarre reviews/comments on their page which really didn’t make sense – a rating of 4.4? Weird, vague comments by other users who didn’t seem to be talking about the same movie I saw and openly admitting that they only watched 30 mins of a 90 min film? I hope that this blemish doesn’t hurt the success of this otherwise well-received film.
The plot is pretty typical, but it’s what they DO with it that matters. The cinematography and direction is pretty straight forward, which makes sense for a film like this on this scale – you can only do so much with a small budget and you only SHOULD do so much with a character-driven piece.
The acting? From these unknowns? Really kind of impressive – I saw that Nick Vergara, who plays Mattie in the film, got commended by my favorite website: FilmschoolRejects.com. I agree with their review. There really are no weak links in this film in terms of the talent.
I found more info at www.TheGraduatesMovie.com about the film and got a free soundtrack and I will see it again when/if it plays near me.
The Graduates opens in select cities this May and the entire soundtrack is available for free on the film’s website: http://www.thegraduatesmovie.com
Michael Cole let slip during Thursday’s episode of WWE Superstars that there would be 10 competitors in Money in the Bank. The expectation is that the final competitor will be added during Raw on Monday. Rating system Meltzer popularized the “star rating” system (originated by Jim Cornette and Norm Dooley), which rates matches on a scale of zero to five stars (sometimes going to negative five stars in the case of bad matches) in a similar manner to that used by many movie critics.[2] As in the field of film, a rating is a largely subjective affair that may take into account the amount of action, as opposed to restholds (“workrate”), the difficulty and variety of moves used, the history of the workers and their feud, the development of an in-match storyline based on the wrestling moves and how they affect the wrestlers, and the overall reaction of the crowd. PPV and DVD Ratings System 1.0 = Complete Trash Back Yard Wrestling 2.0 = Better Production Values Than 1.0 3.0 = See Hero’s Of Wrestling 4.0 = See GLOW For Example 5.0 = Horrible WWE/TNA Quality PPV 6.0 = Bad WWE/TNA Quality PPV 7.0 = Good PPV but Not Recommended 8.0 = Great PPV Recommended to Buy 9.0 = Amazing PPV Must Buy 10 = Sell A Body Part To See This Show!!!
| Print article | This entry was posted by Hot4u on August 13, 2010 at 7:19 am, and is filed under ENTERTAINMENT. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |

about 1 year ago
waiting for the stream to pop up on sd4 d0t org
about 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075
I read all of your comments, and have to say….Your analysis is spot-on bro. People who say ratings don’t mean shit, are often the ones getting their asses kicked by competition. WCW, oh,……I mean TNA will be non-existent by 2012. WWE needs REAL competition, not a rehash of years past.
about 1 year ago
yeah kofi drew of christain will win it
I HOPE ITS CHRISTIAN
about 1 year ago
i agree, but if they give it 20 mins it ought to be fine
about 1 year ago
All the bleeding in TNA is lame. It’s an act of desperation on their part to seem interesting, and I heard that the PPV totally bombed last night.
about 1 year ago
TNA will always be crap as long as it continues to focus on old fossils and stuff that happened over a decade ago. Period.
about 1 year ago
Dude, it’s all the same thing. Getting hit in the head is getting hit in the head. Pro wrestling should not have unprotected chair shots. Hogan and Abyss took unprotected chair shots.
about 1 year ago
benoit didnt die all from chair shots.. he died from all the head butts he did and unprotected chair shots and HGH.. chair shots are mainly 90% blocked from the hands.. and tna does care.. they suspended jesse neal because he took an unprotected chair shot .
about 1 year ago
So you think that chair shots to the head are good, after what happened to Benoit? That’s pure idiocy. Chair shots to the head should be banned. TNA obviously doesn’t give a shit about the health of its wrestlers. That has nothing to do with kids.
So what if they banned blood? You need blood to be entertained? In this age of diseases, people shouldn’t be bleeding.
about 1 year ago
are you serious? wwe is hardly a kids show? they just banned chair shots or objects to the head for the kids.. they banned blood.. because of the kids..
about 1 year ago
That’s a weak comeback, and you know it. Last week, Raw got over four times the ratings of Impact. That’s not just little kids. When I was a kid, I watched wrestling. It makes sense to me that pro wrestling be appropriate for kids to attract a new generation of fans. WWE is hardly a kids’ show though.
about 1 year ago
ratings dont proove anything.. wwe just has more 10 and under kids watching it than tna does.. that explains why wwe is based around entertaining little kids.
about 1 year ago
TNA IS garbage, and the ratings prove it.
Edge and Jericho are both great wrestlers, and you’re an idiot if you think that their feud boils down to who can say “spear” more times.
about 1 year ago
I didn’t deny it because your accusation wasn’t even worthy of an answer. However, your spelling is atrocious.
about 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 You would know since that is the closest thing to sex you will ever get. And I was SHOCKED you didn’t deny whacking off to Edge highlight films.
about 1 year ago
i hope miz & show loose 2 crime time or r-truth & Morrison
about 1 year ago
Keep telling yourself that bullshit. 0.8! Bwahahahahahaha!
about 1 year ago
tna still had a ten times better show than wwe.
about 1 year ago
It’s spelled “masturbating,” moron.
about 1 year ago
@Edgehead10075 Shouldn’t you be masterbating to an Edge highlight video there fag?
about 1 year ago
You’re an idiot.
about 1 year ago
Impact got a 0.8 rating last night. Bwahahahahahahahahahaha! Hardy vs. Styles got a .72. There’s no war. Get over it, TNA marks.
about 1 year ago
how so
about 1 year ago
And it’s for a 4 to 6 age demographic.
about 1 year ago
only Truthslayer would bitch about WWE adding 3 more people to a Money in the Bank Match.This is why wrestlers dont care about Internet fans.